Comments on: Janelle Saffin Article in Daily Telegraph! http://www.ballina.info/blog/2007/10/16/janelle-saffin-article-in-daily-telegraph/ Regular information and comments on the Ballina Shire. Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:11:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: Peter F Kennedy EBR http://www.ballina.info/blog/2007/10/16/janelle-saffin-article-in-daily-telegraph/#comment-56335 Peter F Kennedy EBR Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:30:27 +0000 http://www.ballina.info/blog/2007/10/16/janelle-saffin-article-in-daily-telegraph/#comment-56335 Wake UP! This Piers Ackerman litter is nitpicking against a single supply of estrogen. The problems of society are found elsewhere. Male group-psychology in sport, business, religion and politics contributes to 99% of the world’s problems and 1% of the solutions. From the writer to the perpetrators, everything about this article indicates testosterne-driven XY brains in hierarchy-forming mode. There is an observation that might be raised for more useful discussion of ethics in community decision-making. Try: EVERY atrocity against Humankind (including its resources, environment, neglect and peril) is due to Men-folk making decisions without equal representation of their Women-folk. There are some pre-conditions that impair women, peace, ethics, caution etc etc 1. TESTOSTERONE – androgens are dominant, natural and freely circulating in the blood stream 2. XY BRAIN - a collection of neurons each containing an ‘X’ and a ‘Y’ chromosome 3. XY GROUP POLARISATION – many deliberations dominated by XY brains Your thrust for discussion perhaps could be: How will male Faiths and Authority systems deal with 3500 years of appalling decision making? One answer worth discussion by women (at least) is Reserved Gender Representation in the executives of politics/governance, industry/economics and Belief/Faith systems. Peter F Kennedy EBR PS. Research for yourself Group Polarisation and male-group psychology before you attempt a Zeno paradox to solve any political nitpick. Make sure all the evidence fits your logic against estrogen/female decision-making. Three million years of primate evolution has produced an estrogen driven XX brain that does NOT commission their menfolk of this hominid to design, manufacture and distribute weapons of mass destruction. 'Ethics' - what is your understanding of the word? Wake UP! This Piers Ackerman litter is nitpicking against a single supply of estrogen.
The problems of society are found elsewhere. Male group-psychology in sport, business, religion and politics contributes to 99% of the world’s problems and 1% of the solutions. From the writer to the perpetrators, everything about this article indicates testosterne-driven XY brains in hierarchy-forming mode.
There is an observation that might be raised for more useful discussion of ethics in community decision-making. Try: EVERY atrocity against Humankind (including its resources, environment, neglect and peril) is due to Men-folk making decisions without equal representation of their Women-folk.
There are some pre-conditions that impair women, peace, ethics, caution etc etc

1. TESTOSTERONE – androgens are dominant, natural and freely circulating in the blood stream
2. XY BRAIN - a collection of neurons each containing an ‘X’ and a ‘Y’ chromosome
3. XY GROUP POLARISATION – many deliberations dominated by XY brains

Your thrust for discussion perhaps could be: How will male Faiths and Authority systems deal with 3500 years of appalling decision making?
One answer worth discussion by women (at least) is Reserved Gender Representation in the executives of politics/governance, industry/economics and Belief/Faith systems.

Peter F Kennedy EBR

PS. Research for yourself Group Polarisation and male-group psychology before you attempt a Zeno paradox to solve any political nitpick. Make sure all the evidence fits your logic against estrogen/female decision-making. Three million years of primate evolution has produced an estrogen driven XX brain that does NOT commission their menfolk of this hominid to design, manufacture and distribute weapons of mass destruction. ‘Ethics’ - what is your understanding of the word?

]]>